A program of Pathfinders for Hope

Building the Iron Gate Vallejo Pilot.

Pathfinders for Hope is building the Iron Gate Vallejo Pilot, a coordinated system designed to connect nonprofits, agencies, and service providers across Vallejo. Participating organizations will help test the platform, strengthen the community resource network, and improve how outreach, referrals, services, and outcomes are coordinated and verified.

Need help today? Call 211 — free, 24 hours, any county in California.

What happens when you enroll

What you can expect.

Nothing is running yet. This is the path your case will follow once the pilot begins in Vallejo — five steps, and no step that quietly disappears.

  • Step 01

    Intake

    A conversation, not a form. What you need, written down in plain words.

  • Step 02

    Record, with consent

    No file without your permission. You can say no to any part of it and still get help.

  • Step 03

    Referral

    A connection to the organization that can help with that specific need.

  • Step 04

    Handoff confirmed

    Confirmation that you arrived. Sent is not the same as served.

  • Step 05

    Outcome recorded

    What happened, written down. Nothing closes into “unknown.”

  • Lock 01 / 03

    Nothing closes into “unknown”

    Exit state: unknown

    There is no exit state in the record that can hold an unknown destination. A case cannot be closed into nothing.

  • Lock 02 / 03

    A handoff closes on confirmation

    Sent = served

    A referral is not finished when it is sent. It is finished when the receiving organization confirms the person arrived.

  • Lock 03 / 03

    Consent comes before the record

    Record before consent

    A record cannot exist without a consent step recorded first. Saying no to part of it does not close the door.

  • Live tracking·every case followed from the front door to an outcome

    0 unknown destinations
    1. 01Front doorThe moment the record opens.
    2. 02IntakeWhat the person needs, in plain words.
    3. 03BarriersWhat is standing in the way, named.
    4. 04DecisionWhat was decided, and the legal basis for it.
    5. 05HousingWhere the person is sent, and to whom.
    6. 06Follow-upWhether they arrived. Confirmed by the receiving organization.

    Illustrative — how Operation Iron Gate routes and tracks every case · no one falls off the map

    Aerial view of a Vallejo homeless encampment illustrating the coordination challenge addressed by the Iron Gate Vallejo Pilot.

    Current systems report what happened. Operation Iron Gate makes sure it happens.

    01 / The Crisis

    Fiscal 2018 – 2023 · State of California

    The most expensive homelessness response in America.

    The least accountable.

    California spent more on homelessness between 2018 and 2023 than any state has ever spent on the problem. The money moved through more than 30 programs across nine agencies.

    What the state cannot say is what any of it bought. The agency responsible for tracking outcomes stopped in 2021, and nearly one in three people left programs for a destination nobody recorded. This was built from lived experience, not from a policy paper.

    Case field · 16 × 16 sample Illustrative
  • Enrolled, case open
  • Referred, awaiting placement
  • Housed, outcome recorded
  • At risk, escalated
  • Destination unrecorded
  • 34% of columns are hollow. One in three people left California homelessness programs for an unknown destination.

    The public record
    Every figure links to its source

    01 $0B

    spent on homelessness in five years (2018 to 2023), across 30+ programs and 9 agencies

    02 0

    homeless Californians (2024), 28% of everyone homeless in the United States

    03 0%

    unsheltered, the highest rate of any state in the nation

    04 Zero

    consistent statewide tracking of whether any of it actually worked

    California’s own state auditor
    called it “a data desert.”

    State Auditor Report 2023-102.1 · April 2024

    The data desert

    The money was spent. The outcomes were never tracked.

    In 2024, California’s State Auditor delivered a verdict the state couldn’t answer.

    $24 billion spent over five years, and no reliable way to say what worked. The agency responsible for tracking it stopped in 2021.

    Of five major programs reviewed, only two could be shown to be cost-effective. Three of them, holding $9.4 billion, couldn’t be evaluated at all, because the data didn’t exist.

    Nearly one in three people left programs for “unknown” destinations. No one could say where they went.

    What current systems report

    What a tracked record looks like

    Homelessness-program spending the state tracked, then stopped

    18/19$2.3B
    19/20n/a
    20/21$3.8B
    21/22n/a
    22/23n/a

    Tracking stopped after 2021

    $0Bhomeless + housing, 5 yrs
    $0B3 of 5 programs, since 2020
    0tracking stopped

    You cannot fix what you refuse to measure.

    Bars: Cal ICH Statewide Homelessness Assessment (FY2018/19 to FY2020/21). $24B: Legislative Analyst’s Office. $9.4B unassessed and 2021 cutoff: CA State Auditor, Report 2023-102.1 (April 2024).

    02 / The System

    Operation Iron Gate closes the gap the current system left open.

    Referral tracking and accountability for homeless services, engineered so no one gets lost, and so every case, every handoff, and every outcome can be seen and proven. It sits alongside the intake and assessment system a community already runs — it is not one, and does not replace one.

    • 01Same-day access, every time
    • 02No unlawful no
    • 03Zero unknown destinations
    • 04Sent is not the same as served

    • IGAC: Iron Gate Access Credential

      No government ID is not a reason to be turned away. A person without ID gets a credential the same day, at intake, and can access housing or resources within two hours. Valid 90 days. Renewal is never automatic. It takes a documented, logged review.

      Same-day access, every time

  • Yes-By-Default

    A denial without a coded legal basis is impossible. Not discouraged in the interface. Impossible at the database level. If no law allows the no, the system will not record one. Every denial requires two different people to approve it.

    No unlawful no

  • No Dead Ends

    There is no exit state that records “unknown.” A case cannot be closed into nothing. Every person leaves the system in a known state, connected to a known next step.

    Zero unknown destinations

  • Tracked Handoff

    A referral is not closed when it is sent. It is closed when the receiving organization confirms receipt. Sending a person somewhere is not the same as getting them there, and the system knows the difference.

    Sent is not the same as served

  • 03 / The Glass

    The numbers don’t hide. They’re built to be seen.

    Operation Iron Gate carries a public transparency layer, so results can be watched in the open, not buried in a report no one updates.

    The public transparency layer

    The Glass Public Performance View

    Live Aggregate only. No names, no case IDs

    Data shown is illustrative.

    Cases in motion

    0

    tracked across every stage

    Referrals → outcomes

    0%

    closed the loop, not just sent

    Housing held · 90 days

    0%

    the help that lasted

    Unknown destinations

    0

    because every exit is recorded

    Every case accounted for Updates in near real time Downloadable, citable

    What The Glass is

    A public performance view of the pilot. The same numbers the operator sees, published where a county, a funder or a resident can read them without asking permission.

    Why a provider would publish

    Because the alternative is being judged on claims. A provider that shows its own numbers, including the bad ones, is the only kind that can be trusted with the good ones.

    What is never visible

    No names. No case identifiers. No personally identifying information, ever. Aggregate counts and rates only, at a grain that cannot re-identify a person.

    This isn’t another program. It’s the system that makes sure the handoff lands.

    The people doing this work are not the problem. They have been asked to deliver outcomes on a record that could not follow anyone past the front door. Operation Iron Gate gives them that record.

    The current system

    Operation Iron Gate

    Billions spent, outcomes never consistently tracked

    Every dollar and outcome built to be seen and proven

    Tracking stopped in 2021, with no plan to resume

    Real-time tracking, always on, by design

    One in three people exited to “unknown”

    Every exit recorded, zero unknown destinations

    Referrals counted as sent, never followed

    Referrals tracked to outcomes, providers held to them

    Results claimed, rarely shown

    Results public, in the open, downloadable

    The film

    Why now. What’s different.

    Operation Iron Gate Promotional film
    Watch on YouTube

    Video placeholder · 16:9The promotional film has not been supplied yet. Add its YouTube id to data-yt on this block, or drop iron-gate-brand-film.mp4 and a poster frame into assets/.

    Plays right here. Nothing loads until you press play. Watch on YouTube

    04 / The Pilot

    Measuring the Iron Gate Vallejo Pilot.

    This deployment has not run yet. There are no results to report, and none are claimed here. What follows is the measurement standard, committed to in public before the numbers exist.

    What will be
    measured

    Every case from front door to outcome. Every referral to confirmed receipt. Every exit to a known destination. Nothing closes into “unknown.”

    Clause 01 of 04 · committed before the numbers exist

    The success
    standard

    Housing retention at 90 days is the primary measure. Checkpoints at 30, 60, 90 and 180 days. One number leads, and it is the one that is hardest to hit.

    Clause 02 of 04 · committed before the numbers exist

    What will be
    published

    Results go on The Glass whether they are good or bad. Aggregate only. No names, no case identifiers, no personally identifying information.

    Clause 03 of 04 · committed before the numbers exist

    What happens
    if it fails

    The failure gets published too, on the same dashboard, on the same schedule. A system that publishes its own numbers has to be willing to publish bad ones. If the 90-day retention standard is missed, it will be posted, not explained away.

    Clause 04 of 04 · committed before the numbers exist

    First pilot launching in North Bay, California

    Projected launch

    Late fall


    The data desert has a cost,
    measured in dollars, and in lives.
    The fix exists now.

    The referral standard

    A referral is not finished when it is sent. It is finished when the receiving organization confirms the person arrived.

    What is a closed-loop referral? · Referral tracking software for homeless services · Operation Iron Gate and your HMIS · Who Operation Iron Gate is for · What is a no-dead-end referral system?

    05 / Contact

    Get in touch about the pilot.

    Request a briefing, partner with us, or ask a question. Every message is answered by a person, not a queue.

    No one gets lost. That starts with one conversation.

  • Pilot cityVallejo, California
  • ScopeThe pilot, nothing else

  • Every case seen.
    Every dollar proven.
    No one gets lost.